Algebraization of logics defined by literal-paraconsistent or literal-paracomplete matrices
نویسندگان
چکیده
We study the algebraizability of the logics constructed using literal-paraconsistent and literal-paracomplete matrices described by Lewin and Mikenbergin[11] proving that theyare all algebraizable in the sense of Blok We study the algebraizability of the logics constructed using literal-paraconsistent and literal-paracomplete matrices described by Lewin and Mikenberg in [11], proving that they are all algebraizable in the sense of Blok and Pigozzi in [3] but not finitely algebraizable. A characterization of the finitely algebraizable logics defined by LPP-matrices is given. We also make an algebraic study of the equivalent algebraic semantics of the logics associated to the matrices M 4 appearing in [11] proving that they are not varieties and finding the free algebra over one generator.
منابع مشابه
Literal-paraconsistent and literal-paracomplete matrices
We introduce a family of matrices that define logics in which paraconsistency and/or paracompleteness occurs only at the level of literals, that is, formulas that are propositional letters or their iterated negations. We give a sound and complete axiomatization for the logic defined by the class of all these matrices, we give conditions for the maximality of these logics and we study in detail ...
متن کاملMinimal Paradefinite Logics for Reasoning with Incompleteness and Inconsistency
Paradefinite (‘beyond the definite’) logics are logics that can be used for handling contradictory or partial information. As such, paradefinite logics should be both paraconsistent and paracomplete. In this paper we consider the simplest semantic framework for defining paradefinite logics, consisting of four-valued matrices, and study the better accepted logics that are induced by these matric...
متن کاملNearly every normal modal logic is paranormal
An overcomplete logic is a logic that ‘ceases to make the difference’: According to such a logic, all inferences hold independently of the nature of the statements involved. A negation-inconsistent logic is a logic having at least one model that satisfies both some statement and its negation. A negation-incomplete logic has at least one model according to which neither some statement nor its ne...
متن کاملModal Extensions of Sub-classical Logics for Recovering Classical Logic
In this paper we introduce non-normal modal extensions of the sub-classical logics CLoN, CluN and CLaN, in the same way that S0.5 extends classical logic. The first modal system is both paraconsistent and paracomplete, while the second one is paraconsistent and the third is paracomplete. Despite being non-normal, these systems are sound and complete for a suitable Kripke semantics. We also show...
متن کاملParaconsistent default reasoning
In this paper, a novel technique called bi-default theory is proposed for handling inconsistent knowledge simultaneously in the context of default logic without leading to triviality of the extension. To this end, the positive and negative transformations of propositional formulas are defined such that the semantic link between a literal and its negation is split. It is proven that the bi-defau...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Math. Log. Q.
دوره 54 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2008